<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Dolan Dot Com &#187; Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeldolan.com/category/technology/mobile-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com</link>
	<description>Linux, Law, Open Source, and a Comedy of Errors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will we finally see a broader implementation of open, mobile platform?</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1357</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1357#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#8217;t help but laugh at the irony in the topics this Register article touches on, but a couple points struck me as particularly important. Adobe, yes Adobe, is now proposing an open platform (built on a mobile version of Air) that would run applications from any carrier&#8217;s platform (albeit all those, closed). Now I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but laugh at the irony in the topics <a title="register air mobile open" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/14/mobile_app_stores/page2.html" target="_blank">this Register article</a> touches on, but a couple points struck me as particularly important.</p>
<p>Adobe, yes Adobe, is now proposing an open platform (built on a mobile version of Air) that would run applications from any carrier&#8217;s platform (albeit all those, closed). Now I&#8217;m intrigued. Will we finally see a shift from closed, single carrier channels to open if carriers adopt this strategy? And will Adobe of all companies actually lead the way?</p>
<p>Note, this does not mean the applications themselves or the governance of the channels by the carriers would be open, but at least the platform they run applications on could be. This would be a major change in an industry thus far plagued by closed, private and a thousand &#8220;one-off&#8221; generation implementations. Heck, even Linux mobile adoptions have been &#8220;one offs&#8221;.</p>
<p>I suspect the challenge here will come in testing these applications across an amazing number of devices and revisions, but if Adobe can replicate its strong Flash success on mobile platforms, perhaps we won&#8217;t be stuck in a Silverlight world ;-)</p>
<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, Adobe is set to follow rival Apple into the mobile apps game, but is seeking to provide a common platform that will be supported across stores from many operators and vendors, rather than creating its own portal. The Flash maker, whose dominance of mobile video streaming is dented by Apple&#8217;s refusal to support the technology on the iPhone, will launch a mobile version of its Air product next year.</p>
<p>This will allow the same application to run across many cellphones, unlike its current mobile product, Flash Lite, which varies in implementation between different platforms. Kevin Lynch, Adobe&#8217;s CTO, said at Web 2.0: “Of all the technologies on mobile phones, none of them has more than a 50 per cent reach. As a developer, you have to implement your content about 400 times right now. That is a complete mess.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Another point of interest is Adobe&#8217;s royalty free proposal. Adobe &#8230; will incent implementers to redistribute their implementations back? Adobe has seriously evolved its attitude&#8230; for the better.</p>
<blockquote><p>For companies that agree to keep their implementations of Air open, so apps can be used from any online site, not just designated store, Adobe will eliminate royalties.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1357/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 2.6 is here and rumors of an iPhone interface coming?</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1239</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1239#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still need to update to v2.6, but it&#8217;s officially here. There are a host of cool new features including Gears-based acceleration. I also noticed this link indicating an upcoming iPhone application for easier use of WordPress. Good news on all WordPress fronts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still need to update to v2.6, but <a title="wordpress 2.6" href="http://wordpress.org/download/" target="_blank">it&#8217;s officially here</a>. There are a host of cool new features including Gears-based acceleration.</p>
<p>I also noticed this link indicating an upcoming <a title="wordpress for iphone" href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/07/12/wordpress-for-the-iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone application</a> for easier use of WordPress.</p>
<p>Good news on all WordPress fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1239/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux to outship Windows by 2013 (Windows Mobile that is)</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1205</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow; just how far has Linux come in the mobile space? It will outship Windows for smartphones in the next 5 years. Consider that smartphones may not even include the Motorola lines that run Linux (but are not &#8220;smartphones&#8221;). http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/06/05/smartphone_os_linux/ Smartphones running Linux look set to become far more commonplace within the next five years, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow; just how far has Linux come in the mobile space? It will outship Windows for smartphones in the next 5 years. Consider that smartphones may not even include the Motorola lines that run Linux (but are not &#8220;smartphones&#8221;).</p>
<p><a title="linux outpacing windows mobile" href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/06/05/smartphone_os_linux/" target="_blank">http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/06/05/smartphone_os_linux/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Smartphones running Linux look set to become far more commonplace within the next five years, market watcher ABI Research has forecast.</p>
<p>The firm’s VP, Stuart Carlaw, reckons that Linux will feature on 23 per cent of smartphones by 2013. He added that that share of the market will put the open source operating system in second place in the smartphone popularity stakes, putting it behind Symbian and ahead of Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Mobile worldwide.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1205/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

