<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Edgy Eft: Very Nice, and here are my thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeldolan.com/419/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/419</link>
	<description>Linux, Law, Open Source, and a Comedy of Errors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:41:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sami Dalouche &#187; Xen and SELinux : anything in common ?</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/419/comment-page-1#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami Dalouche &#187; Xen and SELinux : anything in common ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/419#comment-611</guid>
		<description>[...] So now, what I am wondering about is why all the buzz goes to Xen, and nobody really cares about SELinux (except maybe Red Hat which seems to provide decent SELinux support in its distribution). Ubuntu, in any case, does not seem to make SELinux its priority, as Michael Dolan highlights it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So now, what I am wondering about is why all the buzz goes to Xen, and nobody really cares about SELinux (except maybe Red Hat which seems to provide decent SELinux support in its distribution). Ubuntu, in any case, does not seem to make SELinux its priority, as Michael Dolan highlights it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
