<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Depth OpenSUSE 10.1 Review and other rants&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeldolan.com/196/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/196</link>
	<description>Linux, Law, Open Source, and a Comedy of Errors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:41:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dolan Dot Com: Linux, Law, Open Source &#187; YES! Open Source Graphics Drivers!!! From Intel though&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/196/comment-page-1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dolan Dot Com: Linux, Law, Open Source &#187; YES! Open Source Graphics Drivers!!! From Intel though&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/196#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been very vocal in the past (and here) about the need for open source graphics drivers. It&#8217;s never made sense to me what the business strategy is for nVidia and ATI to come up with crazy methods for keeping their drivers proprietary and not distributable by the &#8220;free software&#8221; distributions (OpenSUSE, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian). Finally&#8230; someone listened to ME &#8230; or any of the other 10 millions Linux desktop users complaining for the last 5 years in public forums  The common rationale is that these proprietary drivers contain the secrets to how the chips work&#8230; as if engineers can&#8217;t deduce what a chip is doing by how it&#8217;s laid out, the layers, etc??? They can come pretty close without the drivers&#8230; So while I may have had the easy street getting 3D XGL running on my laptop with nVidia drivers that worked with my system and distro versions, others got the shaft b/c they had to fight through getting his Intel&#8217;s proprietary video drivers to work with XGL. In the future, the positions may be reversed - if Intel gets its way. The Internet is littered with Linux &#8220;3D video card problems&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been very vocal in the past (and here) about the need for open source graphics drivers. It&#8217;s never made sense to me what the business strategy is for nVidia and ATI to come up with crazy methods for keeping their drivers proprietary and not distributable by the &#8220;free software&#8221; distributions (OpenSUSE, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian). Finally&#8230; someone listened to ME &#8230; or any of the other 10 millions Linux desktop users complaining for the last 5 years in public forums  The common rationale is that these proprietary drivers contain the secrets to how the chips work&#8230; as if engineers can&#8217;t deduce what a chip is doing by how it&#8217;s laid out, the layers, etc??? They can come pretty close without the drivers&#8230; So while I may have had the easy street getting 3D XGL running on my laptop with nVidia drivers that worked with my system and distro versions, others got the shaft b/c they had to fight through getting his Intel&#8217;s proprietary video drivers to work with XGL. In the future, the positions may be reversed &#8211; if Intel gets its way. The Internet is littered with Linux &#8220;3D video card problems&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
