<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Hat Acquires Qumranet For $107M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeldolan.com/1301/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1301</link>
	<description>Linux, Law, Open Source, and a Comedy of Errors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1301/comment-page-1#comment-30623</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1301#comment-30623</guid>
		<description>Sometimes acquisitions happen or don&#039;t happen for very funny reasons (e.g. access to capital, IP overlap, internal acquisition models). It&#039;s hard to say, but I think the distinction here is that RH acquired the technology above the virtualization layer that will be great for managing the deployments. KVM will continue as a kernel project independent of any vendor, but it&#039;s the management tooling that RH just acquired that will give it an advantage in the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes acquisitions happen or don&#8217;t happen for very funny reasons (e.g. access to capital, IP overlap, internal acquisition models). It&#8217;s hard to say, but I think the distinction here is that RH acquired the technology above the virtualization layer that will be great for managing the deployments. KVM will continue as a kernel project independent of any vendor, but it&#8217;s the management tooling that RH just acquired that will give it an advantage in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Marcos</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1301/comment-page-1#comment-29721</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1301#comment-29721</guid>
		<description>I just listened to the Red Hat - Qumranet webcast and there was no talk about how long the companies have been negotiating the acquisition. Any ideas? I&#039;m interested to know because it seemed like KVM and Qumranet would have been a perfect fit for Novell. How could Novell or others (Sun, Cisco, HP) have let this technology jewel get purchased right under their noses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just listened to the Red Hat &#8211; Qumranet webcast and there was no talk about how long the companies have been negotiating the acquisition. Any ideas? I&#8217;m interested to know because it seemed like KVM and Qumranet would have been a perfect fit for Novell. How could Novell or others (Sun, Cisco, HP) have let this technology jewel get purchased right under their noses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

