Tuesday, June 24th, 2008
McKinsey: “The next step in open innovation”
There’s a great article over at McKinsey Quarterly’s website on the next step in innovation. It offers a peak into where companies are headed now that they’ve (well some at least) established basic means for tapping into open innovation through communities. To access the full article you need a login.
For most companies, innovation is a proprietary activity conducted largely inside the organization in a series of closely managed steps. Over the last decade, however, a few consumer product, fashion, and technology businesses have been opening up the product-development process to new ideas hatched outside their walls—from suppliers, independent inventors, and university labs.
Executives in a number of companies are now considering the next step in this trend toward more open innovation.1 For one thing, they are looking at ways to delegate more of the management of innovation to networks of suppliers and independent specialists that interact with each other to cocreate products and services. They also hope to get their customers into the act.
I was particularly interested in the hurdles to evolving towards a more participative value chain model. These are the four hurdles McKinsey identified:
- Attracting and motivating cocreators
- Structuring problems for participation
- Governance mechanisms to facilitate cocreation
- Maintaining quality
I would add a fifth challenge which is maintaining visionary leadership. The challenge is that when a company open up to such participation, it’s too easy to justify investment in innovation to solve what customers, suppliers, etc are asking for today. What’s difficult in an environment with tons of user input is to also step back and recognize where you *should be* beyond what’s being asked for today. Think of Apple. If Apple had asked and listened to its customers about what to do next with the iPod next, customers would have posted a million points about X, Y, … N feature enhancements they’d like to see. What Apple did instead is look beyond what was right in front of everyone and set a strategy to take over the mobile device people carry with them. Apple looked further ahead and built an SDK platform for enterprise applications. They set a brilliant strategy that has now resulted in the iPhone becoming the next generation of what was just a music playing device. How many people will carry and iPhone and an iPod? Now look at the boost to Mac sales and you can see Apple has executed this strategy very well.
This challenge is also present in open source communities. Often the community will set many resources to what gap is in front of someone willing to speak up and complain or advise. The challenge is for that community to look a step ahead and identify what are the needs your users will want 3 years from now, not today.
I’ve diverted from my starting post, but while I thought the article was great, I felt compelled to add my personal addendum. The bottom line is that I think companies need to build into their open innovation model a means to capture this longer term vision either from the community if possible (without community NDAs) or through internal means.
June 25th, 2008 at 7:20 am
John Cooke said:
I completely agree with you on vision. Having responded to a number of RFPs on Nine Sigma I have been shocked to see how short sighted some organisations have been in terms of the way they frame their challenges. I take the point that these organisations may be looking for short term fixes to their current problems but even in this case, they way the problem is scoped can shut out major opportunities for product improvements which might actually be simple to introduce. I am also a bit concerned that the Open Innovation market, rather than opening things up for smaller innovators, actually seems to be being used as just another way for big companies to deal with each other.
June 25th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Ash Seha said:
Hi Michael, I agree with your point about the “fifth challenge”, and John Cooke touches on this notion as well: how can open innovation be used as a tool that addresses not only short-term needs but also long-term product and business model vision. Speaking as someone who works for an open innovation intermediary, I think a lot of the “magic” lies in a) how open to long-term thinking an organization already is, and b) how well vendors such as my company help the client to identify areas for innovation that address long-term strategic advantage, not just short-term pain alleviation.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
md said:
I think one of the challenges is also in finding the right participants in the community that can give you the longer term view. A company should look at ways to segment based on near term and long term. I often see those offering long term input into a community get pushed away because they’re “dreaming” or “there’s not enough resources to do that”, but these ideas should be capture. I also think the Blue Ocean strategy model fits in here well. These strategies often come from outside an organization.
These are great comments John and Ash – keep them coming :-)