<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Ts&#8217;o Dissects &#8220;What Sun was trying to do with OpenSolaris&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeldolan.com/1171/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1171</link>
	<description>Linux, Law, Open Source, and a Comedy of Errors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1171/comment-page-1#comment-17101</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1171#comment-17101</guid>
		<description>But Simon, I&#039;d posit that the one or two fair points we&#039;re making are fairly important and are significant roadblocks to wider adoption. And it&#039;s not just Ted and Mike - look at Roy&#039;s resignation letter, look at the comments from people who tried to enter the OpenSolaris community and participate. Look at how many people agree with the points we&#039;re making - the Linux community is very large and very opinionated, but it is a very successful community by almost any measure b/c it&#039;s very open. There&#039;s a reason IBM, HP, Oracle, Intel, AMD (competitors) can come together and co-develop in a massive ecosystem - the underlying infrastructure for the Linux community is truly open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Simon, I&#8217;d posit that the one or two fair points we&#8217;re making are fairly important and are significant roadblocks to wider adoption. And it&#8217;s not just Ted and Mike &#8211; look at Roy&#8217;s resignation letter, look at the comments from people who tried to enter the OpenSolaris community and participate. Look at how many people agree with the points we&#8217;re making &#8211; the Linux community is very large and very opinionated, but it is a very successful community by almost any measure b/c it&#8217;s very open. There&#8217;s a reason IBM, HP, Oracle, Intel, AMD (competitors) can come together and co-develop in a massive ecosystem &#8211; the underlying infrastructure for the Linux community is truly open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeldolan.com/1171/comment-page-1#comment-16983</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeldolan.com/?p=1171#comment-16983</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know, Michael, I would never get away with talking about Linux the way you do about OpenSolaris. Suffice to say that despite you both having one or two fair points there&#039;s plenty to argue with in your (and Ted&#039;s) comments, but attempting to do so with either of you is unlikely to help anyone much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, Michael, I would never get away with talking about Linux the way you do about OpenSolaris. Suffice to say that despite you both having one or two fair points there&#8217;s plenty to argue with in your (and Ted&#8217;s) comments, but attempting to do so with either of you is unlikely to help anyone much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

